mouse α human ulbp3 Search Results


93
R&D Systems anti ulbp3 pe
a. Flow cytometry gating strategy on PDTO cells for analysis of surface staining. Selected cells were gated on single, live cells before quantification of staining signal. b. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of MHC-I, PD-L1, and β2m expression on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. Staining with isotype antibodies for each fluorochrome (PE, APC and FITC) were included as negative control. c. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining to test antitumor reactivity upon PDTO stimulation. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, γδ TCR+ cells and CD8+ as well as CD8–CD4– cells. Reactivity of the sample was based on IFNγ+ cells of the selected population. d. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of NKG2D ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, <t>ULBP3,</t> and ULBP4 on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. e. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining after stimulation with PDTOs in the presence of NKG2D ligand blocking. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, followed by γδ TCR+ and CD8+ as well as CD8– cells. Reactivity of final population was based on IFNγ+ or CD107a+ cells.
Anti Ulbp3 Pe, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/ULBP-3+Antibody+(166510)+%5BPE%2FCy7%5D/bio_rxiv__2021__10__14__464229-213-68-71
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ulbp3 pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems ulbp3
a. Flow cytometry gating strategy on PDTO cells for analysis of surface staining. Selected cells were gated on single, live cells before quantification of staining signal. b. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of MHC-I, PD-L1, and β2m expression on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. Staining with isotype antibodies for each fluorochrome (PE, APC and FITC) were included as negative control. c. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining to test antitumor reactivity upon PDTO stimulation. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, γδ TCR+ cells and CD8+ as well as CD8–CD4– cells. Reactivity of the sample was based on IFNγ+ cells of the selected population. d. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of NKG2D ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, <t>ULBP3,</t> and ULBP4 on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. e. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining after stimulation with PDTOs in the presence of NKG2D ligand blocking. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, followed by γδ TCR+ and CD8+ as well as CD8– cells. Reactivity of final population was based on IFNγ+ or CD107a+ cells.
Ulbp3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/ULBP-3+Antibody+(166510)+%5BmFluor+Violet+450+SE%5D/pmc04741587-117-8-29
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ulbp3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems ulbp3 antibody
List of primers used in qRT-PCR.
Ulbp3 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/ULBP-3+Antibody+(MM0594-6E12)+%5BPE%5D/pmc07052388-119-4-9
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ulbp3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti ulbp3 goat polyclonal antibody
Fig. 2. Typical staining for MIC, RAET1E, RAET1G, ULBP1, ULBP2, and <t>ULBP3.</t> The photographs presented are from representative tissue microarray cores showing high (A) and low (B) expression at ×100 magnification. Bar, 0 to 500 μm in 100-μm increments.
Anti Ulbp3 Goat Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-3+Antibody/10__1158_slash_1078___0432__ccr___09___0991-68-51-55
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ulbp3 goat polyclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems pe conjugated nkg2d ligands
A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for <t>NKG2D</t> expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, <t>ULBP1</t> in green, or <t>ULBP3</t> in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.
Pe Conjugated Nkg2d Ligands, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-1+PE-conjugated+Antibody/pmc08762575-209-73-99
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pe conjugated nkg2d ligands - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems phycoerythrin pe conjugated antihuman nkg2d
FIGURE 2 – Correlations between the expression of MHC class I or total <t>NKG2D</t> ligand and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC (upper panels) or CDC (lower panels) in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of MHC class I (left panels) and total NKG2D ligand (right panels). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and P values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.
Phycoerythrin Pe Conjugated Antihuman Nkg2d, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-3+PE-conjugated+Antibody/pm19358282-25-40-54
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phycoerythrin pe conjugated antihuman nkg2d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
SouthernBiotech mouse anti human ulbp3 antibody
FIGURE 2 – Correlations between the expression of MHC class I or total <t>NKG2D</t> ligand and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC (upper panels) or CDC (lower panels) in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of MHC class I (left panels) and total NKG2D ligand (right panels). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and P values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.
Mouse Anti Human Ulbp3 Antibody, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Mouse+Anti-Human+IgG1+Fc-PE/pmc05385630-115-3-21
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti human ulbp3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems apc anti human ulbp3
ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells released Th1 cytokines and CCL3 chemokine in response to NKG2D ligand-expressing human gastric cancer cell lines. Notes: ( A ) Expression of NKG2D ligands in gastric cancer cell lines. Two human gastric cancer cell lines were stained with specific antibodies recognizing MICA, MICB, ULBP1, ULBP2, or <t>ULBP3,</t> or matched isotype controls (filled histogram), and analyzed by flow cytometry. A murine cell line TC-1 was used as negative control. ( B ) Th1/Th2 cytokine panel determination using cytometric bead array assay. ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells were cultured with gastric cancer cell lines or TC-1 control cells for 20 hours. Supernatants were harvested and assayed to determine the concentration of six different cytokines. The beads were conjugated with antibodies against corresponding cytokines. Secondary antibody conjugated with the fluorescent dye PE was used as a detector. The dots from top to bottom represent IL-2, IL-4, CCL3, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, respectively. Abbreviations: L, CD8α Leader; 2A, cleavable 2A-like peptide sequence; CBA, cytometric bead array; ChNKG2D, chimeric NKG2D; PE, phycoerythrin; IL, interleukin; CCL3, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.
Apc Anti Human Ulbp3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-3+APC-conjugated+Antibody/pmc04622417-51-27-32
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc anti human ulbp3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
SouthernBiotech mouse anti human ulbp3 antibody cumo3
ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells released Th1 cytokines and CCL3 chemokine in response to NKG2D ligand-expressing human gastric cancer cell lines. Notes: ( A ) Expression of NKG2D ligands in gastric cancer cell lines. Two human gastric cancer cell lines were stained with specific antibodies recognizing MICA, MICB, ULBP1, ULBP2, or <t>ULBP3,</t> or matched isotype controls (filled histogram), and analyzed by flow cytometry. A murine cell line TC-1 was used as negative control. ( B ) Th1/Th2 cytokine panel determination using cytometric bead array assay. ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells were cultured with gastric cancer cell lines or TC-1 control cells for 20 hours. Supernatants were harvested and assayed to determine the concentration of six different cytokines. The beads were conjugated with antibodies against corresponding cytokines. Secondary antibody conjugated with the fluorescent dye PE was used as a detector. The dots from top to bottom represent IL-2, IL-4, CCL3, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, respectively. Abbreviations: L, CD8α Leader; 2A, cleavable 2A-like peptide sequence; CBA, cytometric bead array; ChNKG2D, chimeric NKG2D; PE, phycoerythrin; IL, interleukin; CCL3, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.
Mouse Anti Human Ulbp3 Antibody Cumo3, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Mouse+Anti-Human+IgG1+Fc-AP/pmc04422268-72-3-23
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti human ulbp3 antibody cumo3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti human ulbp3
The primer sequences used for QRT‐PCR
Anti Human Ulbp3, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/ULBP3+Antibody/pmc10028019-71-32-43
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ulbp3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human ulbp monoclonal antibodies
The primer sequences used for QRT‐PCR
Anti Human Ulbp Monoclonal Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-3+Antibody/pm24841552-44-24-37
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ulbp monoclonal antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human ulbp3 antibody
The primer sequences used for QRT‐PCR
Anti Human Ulbp3 Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+%CE%B1+human+ulbp3/Human+ULBP-3+Antibody/pmc11772361-42-10-25
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human ulbp3 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a. Flow cytometry gating strategy on PDTO cells for analysis of surface staining. Selected cells were gated on single, live cells before quantification of staining signal. b. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of MHC-I, PD-L1, and β2m expression on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. Staining with isotype antibodies for each fluorochrome (PE, APC and FITC) were included as negative control. c. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining to test antitumor reactivity upon PDTO stimulation. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, γδ TCR+ cells and CD8+ as well as CD8–CD4– cells. Reactivity of the sample was based on IFNγ+ cells of the selected population. d. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of NKG2D ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, ULBP3, and ULBP4 on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. e. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining after stimulation with PDTOs in the presence of NKG2D ligand blocking. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, followed by γδ TCR+ and CD8+ as well as CD8– cells. Reactivity of final population was based on IFNγ+ or CD107a+ cells.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: γδ T cells are effectors of immune checkpoint blockade in mismatch repair-deficient colon cancers with antigen presentation defects

doi: 10.1101/2021.10.14.464229

Figure Lengend Snippet: a. Flow cytometry gating strategy on PDTO cells for analysis of surface staining. Selected cells were gated on single, live cells before quantification of staining signal. b. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of MHC-I, PD-L1, and β2m expression on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. Staining with isotype antibodies for each fluorochrome (PE, APC and FITC) were included as negative control. c. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining to test antitumor reactivity upon PDTO stimulation. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, γδ TCR+ cells and CD8+ as well as CD8–CD4– cells. Reactivity of the sample was based on IFNγ+ cells of the selected population. d. Histogram representation and count for surface staining of NKG2D ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, ULBP3, and ULBP4 on two PDTO lines B2MWT and B2MKO after IFNγ pre-stimulation. e. Flow cytometry gating strategy on γδ T cell samples for analysis of intracellular staining after stimulation with PDTOs in the presence of NKG2D ligand blocking. Lymphocyte population was further gated on single cells, live and CD3+ cells, followed by γδ TCR+ and CD8+ as well as CD8– cells. Reactivity of final population was based on IFNγ+ or CD107a+ cells.

Article Snippet: Briefly, cells were incubated with human Fc receptor block (BioLegend) and stained with the different cell surface antibodies (1:10 anti-CD112-PE [clone R2.525, BD Biosciences], 1:10 anti-CD155-PE [clone 300907, R&D Systems], 1:50 anti-CD277/BTN3A1-PE [clone BT3.1, Miltenyi], 1:100 anti-HLA-A,B,C-FITC [clone W6/32, eBioscience], 1:20 anti-HLA-E­BV421 [clone 3D12, BioLegend], 1:20 anti-HLA-G-APC [clone 87G, BioLegend], 1:300 anti-MICA/B-PE [clone 6D4, BioLegend], 1:10 anti-ULBP1-PE [clone 170818, R&D Systems], 1:20 anti-ULBP2/5/6-PE [clone 165903, R&D Systems], 1:20 anti-ULBP3-PE [clone 166510, R&D Systems], or 1:20 anti-ULBP4-PE [clone 709116, R&D Systems] for 45 min at 4°C.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Staining, Expressing, Negative Control, Blocking Assay

List of primers used in qRT-PCR.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Low-Dose Gemcitabine Treatment Enhances Immunogenicity and Natural Killer Cell-Driven Tumor Immunity in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00331

Figure Lengend Snippet: List of primers used in qRT-PCR.

Article Snippet: Anti-human ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 antibody were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques:

Gemcitabine up-regulates NKG2D ligands in lung cancer cells. (A) qRT-PCR of H60, Raet-1 , and Ulbp1 mRNA in LLC cells. (B) qRT-PCR of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A ( MICA ), MICB , and UL16 binding protein ( ULBP ) 1-6 mRNA in A549 cells. Data are the fold-change of mRNA expression in gemcitabine- and cisplatin-treated cells relative to untreated cells. (C) Surface expression of MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 was measured by flow cytometry on A549 cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO), gemcitabine or cisplatin. Data are representative of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Low-Dose Gemcitabine Treatment Enhances Immunogenicity and Natural Killer Cell-Driven Tumor Immunity in Lung Cancer

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00331

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gemcitabine up-regulates NKG2D ligands in lung cancer cells. (A) qRT-PCR of H60, Raet-1 , and Ulbp1 mRNA in LLC cells. (B) qRT-PCR of major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A ( MICA ), MICB , and UL16 binding protein ( ULBP ) 1-6 mRNA in A549 cells. Data are the fold-change of mRNA expression in gemcitabine- and cisplatin-treated cells relative to untreated cells. (C) Surface expression of MICA/B, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 was measured by flow cytometry on A549 cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO), gemcitabine or cisplatin. Data are representative of three independent experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Anti-human ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, and ULBP3 antibody were purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Immunopeptidomics, Sequencing, Binding Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Control

Fig. 2. Typical staining for MIC, RAET1E, RAET1G, ULBP1, ULBP2, and ULBP3. The photographs presented are from representative tissue microarray cores showing high (A) and low (B) expression at ×100 magnification. Bar, 0 to 500 μm in 100-μm increments.

Journal: Clinical Cancer Research

Article Title: NKG2D Ligand Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer Reveals Associations with Prognosis and Evidence for Immunoediting

doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0991

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2. Typical staining for MIC, RAET1E, RAET1G, ULBP1, ULBP2, and ULBP3. The photographs presented are from representative tissue microarray cores showing high (A) and low (B) expression at ×100 magnification. Bar, 0 to 500 μm in 100-μm increments.

Article Snippet: Anti-MIC monoclonal antibody SR99 (a kind gift from Dr. Sophie Caillat-Zucman, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 561, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Paris, France), anti-ULBP1 goat polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems, Inc.), antiULBP2 monoclonal antibody M311 (a kind gift from Dr. David Cosman, Amgen, Seattle, WA), anti-ULBP3 goat polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems), anti-RAET1E rabbit polyclonal (this study), anti-RAET1G rabbit polyclonal (39), anti-CD16 mouse monoclonal antibody, and clone DJ130c (AbD Serotec).

Techniques: Staining, Microarray, Expressing

A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for NKG2D expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBP1 in green, or ULBP3 in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Diagrammatic sketch of in situ binding kinetic assay and functionalization of RBC. B Representative adhesion frequency ( P a ) versus contact duration ( t c ) curves for NKG2D expressing NK cells ( n ≥ 3) in contact with RBCs ( n ≥ 3) coated with a ligand (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBP1 in green, or ULBP3 in blue) at different contact durations, fitted by a non‐linear in situ binding‐kinetic model (Huang et al , ). Site densities of NKG2D ( m r ) and its ligands ( m l ) are indicated. C–E In situ force‐free affinities (C), on‐rates (D), and off‐rates (E) of NKG2D binding with indicated ligands from mammalian cells. The in situ force‐free kinetics were obtained from fittings with an in situ binding‐kinetic model in (B). F Detection range comparison in affinity measurement of NKG2D and indicated ligands between in situ and in‐solution assay. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Data information: In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from E. coli were from previous study (McFarland & Strong, ). In‐solution affinities of proteins purified from mammalian cells were measured by BLI (Fig ). Every dot in (C–E) represents one independent binding experiment. Error bars in (B‐E) are mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments where * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Situ, Binding Assay, Kinetic Assay, Expressing, Comparison, Purification, Two Tailed Test

A Photomicrographs of micropipette adhesion frequency assay in which NK cell controlled by a micropipette approach, contact, detach with RBC with/without adhesion as marked. Scale bars in (A) represent 5 μm. B–G Flow cytometry analysis of NKG2D and ligands by specific antibodies along with four standard calibration beads (Gray histogram means isotype control, histogram of other colors means sample). NKG2D ligands purified from 293F cells were biotinylated linked to the membrane of SA‐coated human RBC cells. MICA‐linked (B), MICB‐linked (C), ULBP1‐linked (D), and ULBP3‐linked (E) RBC cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary mAb of NKG2D and analyzed by flow cytometry (F). PE standard calibration beads were analyzed along with the isotype control for nonspecific binding (G). H A calibration curve of log of PE molecules/bead (provided by the manufacturer) versus log of measured fluorescence intensity PE‐A was plotted based on data of four standard beads (filled circles). The site density of MICA on RBC was calculated by comparing the log of fluorescence intensity of the sample (open square) with the calibration curve after subtracting negative control fluorescence intensity. I–O BLI binding curves of NKG2D receptor at serious concentrations with immobilized MICA (I), MICB (J), ULBP1 (K), and ULBP3 (L) and the corresponding binding affinities (M), on‐rates (N), and off‐rates (O) derived from BLI experiments. Concentrations of NKG2D were 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM labeled from dark color to light color. Error bars in (M–O) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Photomicrographs of micropipette adhesion frequency assay in which NK cell controlled by a micropipette approach, contact, detach with RBC with/without adhesion as marked. Scale bars in (A) represent 5 μm. B–G Flow cytometry analysis of NKG2D and ligands by specific antibodies along with four standard calibration beads (Gray histogram means isotype control, histogram of other colors means sample). NKG2D ligands purified from 293F cells were biotinylated linked to the membrane of SA‐coated human RBC cells. MICA‐linked (B), MICB‐linked (C), ULBP1‐linked (D), and ULBP3‐linked (E) RBC cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary monoclonal antibodies and analyzed by flow cytometry. NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled primary mAb of NKG2D and analyzed by flow cytometry (F). PE standard calibration beads were analyzed along with the isotype control for nonspecific binding (G). H A calibration curve of log of PE molecules/bead (provided by the manufacturer) versus log of measured fluorescence intensity PE‐A was plotted based on data of four standard beads (filled circles). The site density of MICA on RBC was calculated by comparing the log of fluorescence intensity of the sample (open square) with the calibration curve after subtracting negative control fluorescence intensity. I–O BLI binding curves of NKG2D receptor at serious concentrations with immobilized MICA (I), MICB (J), ULBP1 (K), and ULBP3 (L) and the corresponding binding affinities (M), on‐rates (N), and off‐rates (O) derived from BLI experiments. Concentrations of NKG2D were 200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM labeled from dark color to light color. Error bars in (M–O) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Control, Purification, Membrane, Incubation, Labeling, Bioprocessing, Binding Assay, Fluorescence, Negative Control, Derivative Assay

A–C Schematic diagram (A) of IFN‐γ release assay and IFN‐γ production (B) by human peripheral NK cells stimulated with plate‐coated NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in green and ULBP3 in blue) assessed by Cytometric Bead Array, of which are their half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) (C). D–F Plots of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the effective in situ affinities ( A c K a ) (D), the effective in situ on‐rate ( A c K on ) (E) and in situ off‐rate ( k off ) (F). Data information: The IFN‐γ release assay in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (B) and bars in (C) represent mean values. Error bars in (B) and (C) represent mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–C Schematic diagram (A) of IFN‐γ release assay and IFN‐γ production (B) by human peripheral NK cells stimulated with plate‐coated NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in green and ULBP3 in blue) assessed by Cytometric Bead Array, of which are their half‐maximal effective concentration (EC 50 ) (C). D–F Plots of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the effective in situ affinities ( A c K a ) (D), the effective in situ on‐rate ( A c K on ) (E) and in situ off‐rate ( k off ) (F). Data information: The IFN‐γ release assay in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (B) and bars in (C) represent mean values. Error bars in (B) and (C) represent mean ± SEM. *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Release Assay, Concentration Assay, In Situ, Two Tailed Test

A, B Flow cytometry analysis of the percentages of CD107a + (A) cells pERK + cells (B) under stimulation of different NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBLP3 in blue) compared with SA negative control (gray). C, D Corresponding quantification of percentages of CD107a + cells and pERK + NK cells in (A) and (B). E, F Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of NKG2D ligands stimulated percentages of CD107a + (E) and pERK + (F) NK cells with their reciprocals of EC 50 to release IFN‐γ. G IFN‐γ release (one representative experiment of total three independent biological experiments) of periphery human NK cells under the stimulation of soluble NKG2D ligands at 100 nM. Data information: Every dot in (C) and (D) represents one independent biological experiment. Data are mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test).

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Flow cytometry analysis of the percentages of CD107a + (A) cells pERK + cells (B) under stimulation of different NKG2D ligands (MICA in red, MICB in orange, ULBLP3 in blue) compared with SA negative control (gray). C, D Corresponding quantification of percentages of CD107a + cells and pERK + NK cells in (A) and (B). E, F Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of NKG2D ligands stimulated percentages of CD107a + (E) and pERK + (F) NK cells with their reciprocals of EC 50 to release IFN‐γ. G IFN‐γ release (one representative experiment of total three independent biological experiments) of periphery human NK cells under the stimulation of soluble NKG2D ligands at 100 nM. Data information: Every dot in (C) and (D) represents one independent biological experiment. Data are mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test).

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Two Tailed Test

A, B Representative raw (black) and low‐frequency drift corrected (red) tracked displacements ( X m ) (A) and corresponding histograms and Gaussian fits (B) of BFP. The corrected variance Var( X m ) was obtained from (A). C Var( X m ) is plotted versus reciprocal of suction pressure 1/Δ p and fitted by the motion blur model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). D The motion‐blur corrected variance Var(X) calculated from Var( X m ) is plotted versus 1/ k p, which is the BFP spring constant calculated from Evans model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). E Photomicrograph of BFP. An NK cell and an RBC with a probe bead attached to its apex were aspirated by two opposing micropipettes respectively. The Region of Interest (ROI) for tracking the edge of the probe bead as shown in dashed lines. F, G Representative force versus time curve for no adhesion (F) and force ramp (G). H Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN. I Illustration of the retract phase (blue line, the slope of which is the loading rate) in an example event of BFP bond lifetime. J–N Scatter plot of loading rates (J) of NKG2D interacting with MICA (red, n = 1,499 bond lifetimes), MICB (orange, n = 1,847 bond lifetimes), ULBPL1 (green, n = 530 bond lifetimes), and ULBP3 (blue, n = 1,234 bond lifetimes) and their respective distributions and descriptive statistics for MICA (K), MICB (L) ULBP1 (M), and ULBP3 (N) interacting with NKG2D. The bond lifetimes are from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Data information: Every dot in (H) represents one bond lifetime of NKG2D binding with corresponding ligand from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs in at least 4 independent biological experiments. The scale bar in the picture represents 5 μm. Error bars in (C, D, H, and J) represent mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments. P = 0.1410 between groups (one‐way ANOVA) in (J).

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Representative raw (black) and low‐frequency drift corrected (red) tracked displacements ( X m ) (A) and corresponding histograms and Gaussian fits (B) of BFP. The corrected variance Var( X m ) was obtained from (A). C Var( X m ) is plotted versus reciprocal of suction pressure 1/Δ p and fitted by the motion blur model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). D The motion‐blur corrected variance Var(X) calculated from Var( X m ) is plotted versus 1/ k p, which is the BFP spring constant calculated from Evans model (Chen et al , ; Ju & Zhu, ). E Photomicrograph of BFP. An NK cell and an RBC with a probe bead attached to its apex were aspirated by two opposing micropipettes respectively. The Region of Interest (ROI) for tracking the edge of the probe bead as shown in dashed lines. F, G Representative force versus time curve for no adhesion (F) and force ramp (G). H Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN. I Illustration of the retract phase (blue line, the slope of which is the loading rate) in an example event of BFP bond lifetime. J–N Scatter plot of loading rates (J) of NKG2D interacting with MICA (red, n = 1,499 bond lifetimes), MICB (orange, n = 1,847 bond lifetimes), ULBPL1 (green, n = 530 bond lifetimes), and ULBP3 (blue, n = 1,234 bond lifetimes) and their respective distributions and descriptive statistics for MICA (K), MICB (L) ULBP1 (M), and ULBP3 (N) interacting with NKG2D. The bond lifetimes are from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Data information: Every dot in (H) represents one bond lifetime of NKG2D binding with corresponding ligand from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs in at least 4 independent biological experiments. The scale bar in the picture represents 5 μm. Error bars in (C, D, H, and J) represent mean ± SEM for at least three independent biological experiments. P = 0.1410 between groups (one‐way ANOVA) in (J).

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A, B Schematic diagram (A) and experimental setup (B) of BFP assay to characterize force‐dependent dissociation kinetics of NKG2D binding with different ligands. C Verification of the binding specificity of NKG2D with different ligands. D Representative force versus time curve for measuring single NKG2D‐ligand bond lifetime. E, F Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN and 15 pN (E) and full force spectrum (F). G Ratios of average bond lifetimes for NKG2D/MICA to that of NKG2D and other ligands. Data information: Every dot in (C) represents the adhesion frequency of one cell‐bead pair and the experimental data came from at least two to three repeated trials. Bond lifetimes in (E) and (F) (in which n = 1,505 for MICA, n = 1,852 for MICB, n = 531 for ULBP1, n = 1,241 for ULBP3) of all ligands with NKG2D came from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data points in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (C), (E), and (F) represent mean ± SEM. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Schematic diagram (A) and experimental setup (B) of BFP assay to characterize force‐dependent dissociation kinetics of NKG2D binding with different ligands. C Verification of the binding specificity of NKG2D with different ligands. D Representative force versus time curve for measuring single NKG2D‐ligand bond lifetime. E, F Force‐dependent bond lifetimes of NKG2D and various ligands at 5 pN, 10 pN and 15 pN (E) and full force spectrum (F). G Ratios of average bond lifetimes for NKG2D/MICA to that of NKG2D and other ligands. Data information: Every dot in (C) represents the adhesion frequency of one cell‐bead pair and the experimental data came from at least two to three repeated trials. Bond lifetimes in (E) and (F) (in which n = 1,505 for MICA, n = 1,852 for MICB, n = 531 for ULBP1, n = 1,241 for ULBP3) of all ligands with NKG2D came from at least 19 NK cell‐bead pairs of at least four independent biological experiments. Horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data points in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (C), (E), and (F) represent mean ± SEM. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A, B SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA (A) and ULBP3 (B) in the presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows). C The force versus extension curves from the simulations shown in (A) and (B). Occurrence of the sudden extension changes are indicated in the shaded area and time points correspond with the snapshots in (A) and (B) are marked. D, E Zoomed‐in binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA (D) or ULBP3 (E), corresponding with the configuration (shown as gray dashed box in (A) and (B), respectively). F Distance versus time curves for force‐induced H‐bond formation between indicated residues within NKG2D‐MICA binding interfaces. The dashed red lines represent H‐bonds whose distances are < 3.5 Å. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA (A) and ULBP3 (B) in the presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows). C The force versus extension curves from the simulations shown in (A) and (B). Occurrence of the sudden extension changes are indicated in the shaded area and time points correspond with the snapshots in (A) and (B) are marked. D, E Zoomed‐in binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA (D) or ULBP3 (E), corresponding with the configuration (shown as gray dashed box in (A) and (B), respectively). F Distance versus time curves for force‐induced H‐bond formation between indicated residues within NKG2D‐MICA binding interfaces. The dashed red lines represent H‐bonds whose distances are < 3.5 Å. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay

A–D Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D and loop1 (A) and loop2 (B) in α1 domain of MICA and loop1 (C) and loop2 (D) in α1 domain of ULBP3. A‐D showed the minimum distances between NKG2D and two loops in α1 domain of MICA or ULBP3 during dissociation under mechanical force. E–I SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A (E) and TAT mutants (F) in the absence or presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows), their force versus extension curves (G), and their respective zoomed‐in (from gray dashed box and purple dashed box in (E) and (F), respectively) binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA 3A (H) or TAT mutant (I). Extension transition points are indicated by circles in (G). J, K Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D‐MICA residue 15 of MICA 3A (J) or TAT mutant (K) binding interfaces. E‐K showed that MICA mutants weaken stability of the intermediate states during NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A mutant and MICA TAT mutant. The similar intermediate states are found for NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A and MICA TAT mutants compared to MICA WT; however, there is only one new H‐bond formation between NKG2D K186 and backbone oxygen atom of MICA mutants, compared to 2–3 H‐bonds for MICA WT.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–D Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D and loop1 (A) and loop2 (B) in α1 domain of MICA and loop1 (C) and loop2 (D) in α1 domain of ULBP3. A‐D showed the minimum distances between NKG2D and two loops in α1 domain of MICA or ULBP3 during dissociation under mechanical force. E–I SMD snapshots of NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A (E) and TAT mutants (F) in the absence or presence of force (directions are indicated by black arrows), their force versus extension curves (G), and their respective zoomed‐in (from gray dashed box and purple dashed box in (E) and (F), respectively) binding interfaces of NKG2D with MICA 3A (H) or TAT mutant (I). Extension transition points are indicated by circles in (G). J, K Distance versus time curves for force‐induced binding residues within NKG2D‐MICA residue 15 of MICA 3A (J) or TAT mutant (K) binding interfaces. E‐K showed that MICA mutants weaken stability of the intermediate states during NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A mutant and MICA TAT mutant. The similar intermediate states are found for NKG2D dissociation with MICA 3A and MICA TAT mutants compared to MICA WT; however, there is only one new H‐bond formation between NKG2D K186 and backbone oxygen atom of MICA mutants, compared to 2–3 H‐bonds for MICA WT.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Mutagenesis, Residue

A, B Abolishments of force‐induced binding residues by 3A mutations (MICA 3A, n = 526) and TAT mutations (MICA TAT, n = 580) impairs NKG2D’s catch bond with MICA WT ( n = 1,505) (A) and IFN‐γ release (B). C–E EC 50 (C) and IFN‐γ release of NK cells stimulated by indicated MICA mutants at a concentration of 11 nM (D) and 22 nM (E). Data information: Bond lifetimes in (A) of MICA WT and mutants with NKG2D came from at least 21 pairs of cells and beads of at least three repeated experiments. IFN‐γ release of NK cells in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (A) and (B), horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data point in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (A–E) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, B Abolishments of force‐induced binding residues by 3A mutations (MICA 3A, n = 526) and TAT mutations (MICA TAT, n = 580) impairs NKG2D’s catch bond with MICA WT ( n = 1,505) (A) and IFN‐γ release (B). C–E EC 50 (C) and IFN‐γ release of NK cells stimulated by indicated MICA mutants at a concentration of 11 nM (D) and 22 nM (E). Data information: Bond lifetimes in (A) of MICA WT and mutants with NKG2D came from at least 21 pairs of cells and beads of at least three repeated experiments. IFN‐γ release of NK cells in (B) was one representative experiment of three total independent experiments. Data points in (A) and (B), horizontal lines in (C), bars in (E), and data point in (F) represent mean values. Error bars in (A–E) represent mean ± SEM for biological triplicate experiments. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 (two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test). Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: Binding Assay, Concentration Assay, Two Tailed Test

A–C Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent in situ k off at 5 pN (A), 10 pN (B) 15pN (C). D Heatmap of force‐dependent in situ affinities A c K a of NKG2D binding with different ligands. E–G Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent effective in situ affinities A c K a at 5 pN (E), 10 pN (F), and 15 pN (G). H Comparison of corresponding Pearson coefficients between all NKG2D ligands in situ binding kinetics and ligand‐induced NK functions. I Detection range comparison in force‐dependent affinity of NKG2D and indicated ligands under difference force. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Source data are available online for this figure.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–C Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent in situ k off at 5 pN (A), 10 pN (B) 15pN (C). D Heatmap of force‐dependent in situ affinities A c K a of NKG2D binding with different ligands. E–G Plots and Pearson correlation analysis of reciprocals of EC 50 versus the force‐dependent effective in situ affinities A c K a at 5 pN (E), 10 pN (F), and 15 pN (G). H Comparison of corresponding Pearson coefficients between all NKG2D ligands in situ binding kinetics and ligand‐induced NK functions. I Detection range comparison in force‐dependent affinity of NKG2D and indicated ligands under difference force. Bars in different colors are the ratios of the affinities of indicated ligands divided by that of ULBP1. Source data are available online for this figure.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Situ, Binding Assay, Comparison

Schematic diagram of NKG2D‐ligand combination and dissociation model. NKG2D binds and dissociates with multiple ligands at different initial on‐rates ( k on‐initial ) and off‐rates ( k off ). Ubiquitous mechanical forces in vivo regulate the disassociation of NKG2D and ligands. Probabilities of productive signals of different ligands binding with NKG2D when at forces of 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Probabilities of output signals at 300s varied with force‐dependent off‐rates of the three ligands, MICA, MICB, and ULBP3. Off‐rates at different mechanical forces measured by experiments had been marked by specific symbols: pentagram, square, circle, and right‐pointing triangle represented off‐rates at 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Contour plots showed probabilities of output signals at 300s produced by continuously variable initial on‐rates and force‐dependent off‐rates.

Journal: The EMBO Journal

Article Title: NKG2D discriminates diverse ligands through selectively mechano‐regulated ligand conformational changes

doi: 10.15252/embj.2021107739

Figure Lengend Snippet: Schematic diagram of NKG2D‐ligand combination and dissociation model. NKG2D binds and dissociates with multiple ligands at different initial on‐rates ( k on‐initial ) and off‐rates ( k off ). Ubiquitous mechanical forces in vivo regulate the disassociation of NKG2D and ligands. Probabilities of productive signals of different ligands binding with NKG2D when at forces of 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Probabilities of output signals at 300s varied with force‐dependent off‐rates of the three ligands, MICA, MICB, and ULBP3. Off‐rates at different mechanical forces measured by experiments had been marked by specific symbols: pentagram, square, circle, and right‐pointing triangle represented off‐rates at 0 pN, 5 pN, 10 pN, and 15 pN, respectively. Contour plots showed probabilities of output signals at 300s produced by continuously variable initial on‐rates and force‐dependent off‐rates.

Article Snippet: To measure the site densities of NKG2D receptor, NK cells were incubated with PE‐labeled mouse anti‐human NKG2D monoclonal antibody 5C6 (12‐5879‐42, eBioscience, USA) or isotype control at 2.5 μg/ml in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. To measure the site densities of NKG2D ligands linked on the surfaces of RBCs via biotin‐streptavidin coupling, NKG2D ligand‐coated RBCs were incubated with monoclonal antibodies of PE‐conjugated NKG2D ligands (mouse anti‐human MICA antibody, 12302‐MM04‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human MICB antibody, 10759‐MM12‐P, Sino Biological Inc., China; mouse anti‐human ULBP1 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA; mouse anti‐human ULBP3 antibody, FAB1380P, R&D Systems, USA) or isotype controls according to the manufacturer’s instructions in 100 μl of FACS Buffer (DMEM, 5 mM EDTA, and 1% BSA) at RT for 30 min. NK cells or RBCs incubated with corresponding antibodies were analyzed by a flow cytometer (CytoFLEX S, Beckman Coulter, USA) together with Quantibrite (340495.0, BD Biosciences, USA).

Techniques: In Vivo, Binding Assay, Produced

FIGURE 2 – Correlations between the expression of MHC class I or total NKG2D ligand and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC (upper panels) or CDC (lower panels) in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of MHC class I (left panels) and total NKG2D ligand (right panels). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and P values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.

Journal: International journal of cancer

Article Title: Expression of the ULBP ligands for NKG2D by B-NHL cells plays an important role in determining their susceptibility to rituximab-induced ADCC.

doi: 10.1002/ijc.24351

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 2 – Correlations between the expression of MHC class I or total NKG2D ligand and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC (upper panels) or CDC (lower panels) in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of MHC class I (left panels) and total NKG2D ligand (right panels). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and P values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.

Article Snippet: Mouse mAbs to human UL16-binding protein (ULBP)1 (clone: 170818, IgG2a), ULBP2 (165903, IgG2a), ULBP3 (166510, IgG2a), Allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated antihuman major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related genes A (MICA) (159227, IgG2b), MHC class I chain-related genes B (MICB) (236511, IgG2b), Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antihuman NKG2D (149810, IgG1) and appropriate isotype-matched control mAbs were purchased from R&D Systems, (Minneapolis, MN).

Techniques: Expressing, Lysis

FIGURE 3 – Correlations between the expression of the NKG2D ligand, ULBP1–3, or MICA/B and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of ULBP1 (upper left panel), ULBP2 (upper middle panel), ULBP3 (upper right panel), MICA (lower left panel), and MICB (lower right panel). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and p values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.

Journal: International journal of cancer

Article Title: Expression of the ULBP ligands for NKG2D by B-NHL cells plays an important role in determining their susceptibility to rituximab-induced ADCC.

doi: 10.1002/ijc.24351

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 3 – Correlations between the expression of the NKG2D ligand, ULBP1–3, or MICA/B and rituximab-induced ADCC in B-NHL cell lines. ADCC in the presence of 10 lg/ml rituximab against 30 different CD201 B-NHL cell lines determined by 51Cr release assays. Y-axis: % lysis. X-axis: MFI ratio of ULBP1 (upper left panel), ULBP2 (upper middle panel), ULBP3 (upper right panel), MICA (lower left panel), and MICB (lower right panel). Each dot plot in each panel represents 1 cell line in the same manner as in Figure 1. The coefficients and p values assessed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient testing are indicated in each panel.

Article Snippet: Mouse mAbs to human UL16-binding protein (ULBP)1 (clone: 170818, IgG2a), ULBP2 (165903, IgG2a), ULBP3 (166510, IgG2a), Allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated antihuman major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related genes A (MICA) (159227, IgG2b), MHC class I chain-related genes B (MICB) (236511, IgG2b), Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antihuman NKG2D (149810, IgG1) and appropriate isotype-matched control mAbs were purchased from R&D Systems, (Minneapolis, MN).

Techniques: Expressing, Lysis

ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells released Th1 cytokines and CCL3 chemokine in response to NKG2D ligand-expressing human gastric cancer cell lines. Notes: ( A ) Expression of NKG2D ligands in gastric cancer cell lines. Two human gastric cancer cell lines were stained with specific antibodies recognizing MICA, MICB, ULBP1, ULBP2, or ULBP3, or matched isotype controls (filled histogram), and analyzed by flow cytometry. A murine cell line TC-1 was used as negative control. ( B ) Th1/Th2 cytokine panel determination using cytometric bead array assay. ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells were cultured with gastric cancer cell lines or TC-1 control cells for 20 hours. Supernatants were harvested and assayed to determine the concentration of six different cytokines. The beads were conjugated with antibodies against corresponding cytokines. Secondary antibody conjugated with the fluorescent dye PE was used as a detector. The dots from top to bottom represent IL-2, IL-4, CCL3, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, respectively. Abbreviations: L, CD8α Leader; 2A, cleavable 2A-like peptide sequence; CBA, cytometric bead array; ChNKG2D, chimeric NKG2D; PE, phycoerythrin; IL, interleukin; CCL3, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.

Journal: OncoTargets and therapy

Article Title: Potential therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis by NKG2D ligands-specific T cells

doi: 10.2147/OTT.S91122

Figure Lengend Snippet: ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells released Th1 cytokines and CCL3 chemokine in response to NKG2D ligand-expressing human gastric cancer cell lines. Notes: ( A ) Expression of NKG2D ligands in gastric cancer cell lines. Two human gastric cancer cell lines were stained with specific antibodies recognizing MICA, MICB, ULBP1, ULBP2, or ULBP3, or matched isotype controls (filled histogram), and analyzed by flow cytometry. A murine cell line TC-1 was used as negative control. ( B ) Th1/Th2 cytokine panel determination using cytometric bead array assay. ChNKG2D receptor-modified T cells were cultured with gastric cancer cell lines or TC-1 control cells for 20 hours. Supernatants were harvested and assayed to determine the concentration of six different cytokines. The beads were conjugated with antibodies against corresponding cytokines. Secondary antibody conjugated with the fluorescent dye PE was used as a detector. The dots from top to bottom represent IL-2, IL-4, CCL3, IL-10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, respectively. Abbreviations: L, CD8α Leader; 2A, cleavable 2A-like peptide sequence; CBA, cytometric bead array; ChNKG2D, chimeric NKG2D; PE, phycoerythrin; IL, interleukin; CCL3, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma.

Article Snippet: NKG2DL expression was analyzed with allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-human MICA (clone 159227), APC anti-human MICB (clone 236511), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-human ULBP1 (clone 170818), PE-anti-human ULBP2 (clone 165903), and APC-anti-human ULBP3 (clone 166510) (all R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Techniques: Modification, Expressing, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Negative Control, Cell Culture, Control, Concentration Assay, Sequencing

The primer sequences used for QRT‐PCR

Journal: Cancer Medicine

Article Title: A signature based on NKG2D ligands to predict the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection

doi: 10.1002/cam4.5318

Figure Lengend Snippet: The primer sequences used for QRT‐PCR

Article Snippet: Antibodies used in IHC were as follows: goat anti‐human ULBP‐2/5/6 (Invitrogen Cat# PA5‐47118, 1:500 dilution), rabbit anti‐human MICA/MICB (Abcam Cat# ab224702, 1:50 dilution), rabbit anti‐human ULBP1 (Abcam Cat# ab238331, 1:1000 dilution), rabbit anti‐human ULBP3 (Novus Cat# nbp2‐31,866, 1:1000 dilution), and mouse anti‐human ULBP4 (Santa Cruz Cat# sc‐390,784, 1:50 dilution).

Techniques: Sequencing